Big Sitting
Tuesday, March 10th, 2009 10:01pm
It’s been about 1 1/4 years since I started my zen practice in earnest. The first half of last year, I was very consistent with my zazen. But, the second half of the year, I started getting a lot more lackadaisical. By the end of the year, I was occasionally missing two or three days a week. That’s just silly.
And that’s why I decided to take part in this year’s “Big Sit” sponsored by Tricycle. I’ve become a fan of Tricycle over the other Buddhist print magazines thanks to some really good issues in the last year. This 90-day practice session struck me because a.) it’s following zen practice (the last session was a 30-day Vipassana session), b.) it encouraged at least 20 minutes of daily zazen, c.) over the course of the 90 days, participants read the Genjokoan and podcasts with well-respected western zen teachers discuss it, and d.) there’s an online community built specifically for the event. It started a couple of weeks ago and I’ve been steady with my practice, increasing from 15 minutes at night to 20. I did miss two days, but that was a conscious decision. I’m behind on my podcasts and participation in the community, but I have been reading the Genjokoan and a few different interpretations that I’ve dug up.
So, anyway, that’s going well.
In the “Big Sit” issue of Tricycle (Spring 2009), there’s an article by Shozan Jack Haubner titled “Son of a Gun” where he discusses his life as the son of a man who creates the guns that are used in Iraq. It’s a wonderful article and this paragraph in particular stuck (emphasis mine):
In the Buddhist view, I depend on you for my existence. All things depend on each other, equally. Welcome to the doctrine of dependent origination. It’s teeter-totter metaphysics—I arise, you arise; you arise, I arise. Forget about our presumed Maker, the diving machinist in the sky. You are you because you are not something else; therefore, what you are not—the chair beneath you, the air in your lungs, these words—births you through an infinity of opposites. It’s like the ultimate Dr. Seuss riddle: Without all the things that are not you, who would you be you to? There’s no Higher Power in this system to grab onto for support; we are all already supporting each other. Pull a person or people the wrong way, and you immediately redefine yourself in light of what you’ve done to your neighbor.
It’s becoming more and more clear to me how this idea of “self” that we learn isn’t really quite right. We’re inextricably tied to everything and everyone else here and our actions and attitudes spread throughout the web.
